Bernard Williams and the concept of shame: What makes an emotion moral?

Dina Mendonça; Susana Cadilha

doi:10.25180/lj.v21i1.172

Authors

Dina Mendonça Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
Susana Cadilha Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v21i1.172

Keywords:

Bernard Williams, shame, moral emotions, thick concepts, meta-emotions

Abstract

The paper proposes a way to understand moral emotions in ethics building upon Bernard Williams' claim that feelings, emotions and sentiments are an integral part of rationality. Based upon Bernard Williams' analysis of shame we argue that the richness and thickness that it is attached to some emotions is the key to understand why some emotions have a distinct ethical resonance. The first part takes up Bernard Williams' philosophical assessment of the concept of shame (Williams 1993) establishing a general framework to show how recent developments in philosophy of emotions are in line with the far-reaching consequences of Bernard Williams' insights. Then we highlight the way in which there is both an historical relativity to emotions and an intemporal understanding of their ethical role, and use the concept of meta-emotion to reinforce the idea that what makes some emotions moral requires employing Williams' distinction between thick and thin concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baier, Ann. "What Emotions Are About," Philosophical Perspectives 4, (1990):1-29.

Bartsch Anne, Markus Appel, and Dennis Storch. "Predicting emotions and metaemo-tions at the movies: The role of the need for affect in audiences' experience of horror and drama," Communication Research, vol. 37, no. 2 (2010): 167–190.

Bartsch, Anne et al. "Appraisal of emotions in media use: Toward a process model of metaemotion and emotion regulation." Media Psychology, vol. 11, no. 1 (2008): 7–27.

Belli, Simone and Broncano, Fernando. "Trust as a Meta-Emotion," Metaphilosophy, vol. 48, no. 4, July (2017): 430-448.

Beer, Niels and Giovanni Moneta, "Construct and concurrent validity of the Positive Metacognitions and Positive Meta-Emotions Questionnaire" Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 49 (2010): 977-982.

Ben-ze'ev, Aaron . "Emotions and morality". The Journal of Value Inquiry vol. 31

(1997): 195–212.

Blackburn, Simon. "Through Thick and Thin", Proceedings of the Aristotelian

Society, Supplementary Volume 66 (1992): 285–99.

Blackburn, Simon. Ruling Passion, Oxford: Clarendon, 1998.

Cairns, Douglas. "Horror, pity and the visual in ancient Greek aesthetics," in

Douglas Cairns and Damien Nelis (eds.). Emotions in the Classical World. Methods, Ap-proaches and Directions Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2017, 53-78.

De Sousa, Ronald. "Moral Emotions". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice vol. 4, no. 2 (2001): 109-126.

Dewey, John. Democracy and Education, 1916, in Jo Ann Boydston (ed.). The Middle Works of John Dewey, Volume 9, 1899-1924, Vol. 9. Carbondale and Edwardsville: South-ern Illinois University Press, 1980.

Ferrari, Michel, and Emiko Koyama. "Meta-emotions about anger and amae: A cross-cultural Comparison." Consciousness & emotion, vol. 3, no. 2 (2002): 197-211.

Goldie, Peter. "Thick concepts and emotion," in Daniel Callcut (ed.). Reading

Bernard Williams. London and New York: Routledge, 2008, 94-109.

Gottman, John Mordechai, Katz, Lynn F., and Carole Hooven. "Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families: theoretical models and preliminary data." Journal of Family Psychology, (1996) 10 (3): 243-268.

Gottman, John Mordechai, Lynn Fainsilber Katz, and Carole Hooven. Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.

Gross, James J. "The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative re-view," Review of General Psychology, vol. 2, no. 3 (1998): 271-299.

Haradhvala, Natasha. "Meta-Emotions in Daily Life: Associations with Emotional Awareness and Depression". Thesis. St. Louis, Missouri: Washington University in St. Louis, 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7936/K7H130F6

Howard, Scott Alexander. "Metaemotional Intentionality," Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (2017): 406-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12093

Jäger Christoph, and Anne Bartsch. "Meta-emotions," Grazer Philosophische Studien 73, (2006):179-204.

Heuer, Ulrike. "Thick Concepts and Internal Reasons". In Ulrike Heuer and Gerald

Lang (eds.) Luck, Value, and Commitment. Themes from the Ethics of Bernard Williams. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Kristjánsson, Kristján. "'Emotional intelligence in the classroom? An Aristotelian

Critique". Educational Theory, vol. 56, no. 1 (2006): 39-56.

Koven, Nancy S. "Specificity of metaemotion effects on moral decision making" Emo-tion, vol. 11, no. 5, (2011): 1255–1261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025616

Mendonça, Dina. "Emotions about Emotions," Emotion Review vol. 5, no. 4 (2013): 390-396.

Moore, Adrian. "Maxims and thick ethical concepts," Ratio (new series), vol. 19 (2006): 129–47.

Pugmire, David. Sound Sentiments. Integrity in the emotions. Oxford: Oxford Universi-ty Press, 2005.

Putnam, Hilary. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Harvard University Press, 2002.

Sheikh, Sana and Ronnie Janoff-Bulman. "The 'Shoulds' and 'Should Nots' of Moral

Emotions: A Self-regulatory Perspective on Shame and Guilt," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 2 (2010): 213-224.

Williams, Bernard. Making Sense of Humanity and other philosophical papers 1982-1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Williams Bernard. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana, 1985.

Williams, Bernard. "Moral Luck". In Bernard Williams. Moral Luck.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, 20-40.

Williams, Bernard. "Morality and the Emotions". In Bernard Williams, Problems of the Self: Philosophical Paper 1956-1972. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973, 207-229.