Bridging the Gap between Rationality, Normativity and Emotions

Authors

  • Frédéric Minner Department of Sociology, University of Geneva, Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v21i1.171

Keywords:

rationality, values, norms, emotions, intentional explanation

Abstract

This paper argues that emotions play a key role in intentional explanation, because they can be conceived as rational. Furthermore, their rationality is specific as they make agents act and react with respect to values and norms. Indeed, emotions have cognitive bases and are reactions to the presence of values and are regimented by epistemic norms that can be constrained by social norms. Additionally, thanks to their action and cognitive tendencies emotions ground rational actions by providing, among other features of rationality, intentions to promote values through norms of action that can also be constrained by social norms. In that sense, emotions seem to bridge the gap between rationality and normativity by articulating the rational detection and production of values related to epistemic and action norms that can be both regimented by social norms.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ben-Ze'ev, Aaron. "Envy and Inequality." The Journal of Philosophy Vol. 89, Nr. 11 (1992): 551–581.

D'Arms, Justin, and Daniel Jacobson. "The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘appropriateness' of Emotions." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. 61, Nr. 1 (2000): 65–90.

de Sousa, Ronald. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press, 1987.

Deigh, John. Emotions, Values and the Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Deonna, Julien, and Fabrice Teroni. The Emotions: A Philosophical Introduction. Ab-ingdon: Routledge, 2012.

Elster, Jon. Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Elster, Jon. Alexis de Tocqueville: The First Social Scientist. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Elster, Jon. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Elster, Jon. Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Oslo: Cambridge University Press Universitetsforlaget, 1983.

Elster, Jon. L'Irrationalité : Traité Critique de l'homme Économique, Vol. II. Paris: Édi-tions du Seuil, 2010.

L'Irrationalité : Traité Critique de l'homme Économique, Vol. II. Paris : Éditions du Seuil, 2010 "Rationality, Emotions, and Social Norms." Synthese Vol. 98, Nr. 1 (1994): 21–49.

Fontaine, Johnny J. R., Klaus R. Scherer, and Cristina Soriano (eds.). Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Frijda, Nico H. The Emotions. Cambridge/New York/Paris : Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme, 1986.

Frijda, Nico H. The Laws of Emotion. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associ-ates, 2007.

Frijda, Nico H., and Batja Mesquita. "Beliefs through Emotions." in Nico H. Frijda, An-tony S. R. Manstead, and Sacha Bem (eds.). Emotions and Beliefs. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 45–77.

Hochschild, Arlie. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling, Twenti-eth Anniversary Edition with a New Afterword. Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 2003.

Lazarus, Richard L. Emotion and Adaptation. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Lerner, Jennifer. S. et al. "Emotion and Decision Making." Annual Review of Psycholo-gy Vol. 66 (2015): 799–823.

Downloads

Published

04.09.2019

How to Cite

Minner, F. (2019). Bridging the Gap between Rationality, Normativity and Emotions. Labyrinth, 21(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v21i1.171

Issue

Section

Contemporary Philosophical Debates on Values